Privacy and the Nasty Advertising Hand

Privacy and the nasty advertising hand will be the topic of
discussion in places where there is a reasonable expectation
of privacy. Some like it "hot", as they say, real hot.

"Hot houses" are places where it can be substantiated that
there is legitimate cause with consequences of impact to run
"live" surveillance with networks investigating drug crimes.
This is what has been said by former police officers who are
knowledgeable about such "investigations", investigations that
usually get stifled in the courts/criminal justice system
because the profit motive is higher to allow drug crimes to
go without prosecution in a timely manner.

Nobody who lives drug-free would allow privacy violations
for profit- mongers who watch drug suspects, as though it
is their sacrifice for the ills of addiction and drug type
economies. Anyone who suggests that at this point, years
after the cover-up at 1970 Liko Street by favorite corrupt
Democrats who party with Inouyes best partisan allies, that
this crime site should result in "reconciliation" for the
sake of corrupt Dems' profit is a desperate idiot looking
for idiots.

Those who covered-up have plastic bubble lives just waiting
for the next prick to pass on by their way. pop! Pinoccio
stop with the delusion that anyone has to choose between the
non-existent court system in Hawaii with the corrupt boutique
invetigation from California. Pinoccio, the shake-down has
already taken place.

It's a political catastrophe for Democrats every which way
including loose. Especially loose. Sabe?